Fort Myers injury lawyer

Published on: October 29, 2024

Fort Myers Injury Lawyer Warns of Florida Golf Cart Owner Liability

Golf cart owners in Florida, listen up! You could be held legally responsible if someone is hurt in a golf cart accident involving your golf cart, even if you weren’t the one operating it. As a Fort Myers injury lawyer can explain, you have a duty as the owner of that golf cart to avoid handing over the keys to someone who is careless. That could include someone you know if they drive recklessly, has a history of drunk driving or a teenager without much driving experience; this same law applies even if the person who you loan the cart to has a good driving record and has no history of driving issues. This is especially true if the golf cart is going to be operated on a public road with cars.

Golf carts were designated as “dangerous instrumentalities” – the same as motor vehicles – in the 1984 Florida Supreme Court case of Meister v. Fisher. Because a dangerous instrumentality is deemed inherently dangerous, their owners can be found directly and/or vicariously liable when someone is hurt while operating it negligently. It doesn’t matter if the owner wasn’t the operator, so long as the operator had the owner’s permission.

That point was underscored in a recent Florida injury lawsuit that resulted in a multi-million dollar damage award.

The case in question was out of Miami-Dade County, where a 12-year-old boy suffered catastrophic and permanent injuries in a golf cart accident in 2016. A motor vehicle struck a golf cart full of minors at an intersection – but only after the golf cart operator, 16-years-old, blew past a stop sign. The golf cart flipped and the occupants – all under 18 – were ejected. Two were left in critical condition, including the plaintiff in this case.

Golf Cart Owner Ordered to Pay $50 Million for Florida Golf Cart Accident

The owner of the golf cart was the 16-year-old’s step-uncle. A trial court determined the golf cart owner authorized the teen to drive the golf cart around the neighborhood with the golf cart owner’s son and three other friends. One of those was the plaintiff.

After the accident, the boy’s parents sued both the operator of the golf cart and the owner in the case of Gonzalez v. Chiong. (The driver of the car was not negligent in this case, and therefore was not named as a defendant.)

Before trial, the driver of the golf cart/his parents entered into a consent judgement with the injured boy’s parents for $18 million. Attorneys for the golf cart driver asserted his operation of the golf cart was covered under his parents’ auto insurance policy, as it was a “non-owned auto.” The insurance company, of course, pushed back, arguing that the policy didn’t cover golf cart accidents because a golf cart “doesn’t meet the definition of a private passenger auto.” The trial court agreed with the insurer, granting them summary judgment, but that was later reversed by the 11th Judicial Circuit Court, which ruled the golf cart was covered under the auto insurance policy.

Trial proceeded against the owner of the golf cart proceeded, with plaintiffs arguing he owed the young passenger and his parents a duty of care, negligently breached that duty by entrusting the golf cart, and therefore should be liable for his injuries. The trial court sided with plaintiffs, ordering the golf cart owner to pay a total of $46 million in past and future economic and non-economic damages, and another $4 million to his parents for loss of consortium.

It’s important to note that while the court in this case found the golf cart owner directly negligent for entrusting the golf cart to his 16-year-old step-nephew, other courts have applied the dangerous instrumentality doctrine in Florida golf cart accident cases and found the golf cart owners vicariously liable. That means the court wouldn’t even need to find that the owner was negligent in handing over the keys to another. It would be sufficient to show they gave the operator permission, and that operator subsequently acted without care and caused someone else to get hurt. Continue reading

Published on: September 6, 2024

Injuries in Schools: Fort Myers Injury Lawyer Discusses Liability

by Leland Garvin

injuries in schools Fort Myers injury lawyer School is back in session in South Florida! We all are hoping for a happy, healthy, productive school year. Of course, it seems inevitable that there will be at least some injuries in schools.

If your child is injured at school, it may be possible to take legal action, but a lot of it depends on the severity of the injury and how it all went down. As a parent, you understand there are occasional playground accidents or gym class mishaps. If it’s just a bump or a scratch, there may not be much you can do about that. But if your child was seriously injured, violently assaulted or required hospitalization or surgery as a result of their injuries, you should really get a Fort Myers injury lawyer on the phone to talk through your options.

As government agencies, many schools are protected by state sovereign immunity laws. But that doesn’t mean they’re absolved of legal responsibility to keep kids safe. They can still be held accountable when they breach their duty of care and someone gets seriously hurt as a result.

Was the School Negligent?

The school district, employees and even some school contractors owe a duty to use reasonable care to make sure your child isn’t at an unreasonable risk of harm. Teachers, counselors, coaches, administrators – they must provide a safe environment and do what’s reasonably necessary to keep them safe.

If the school breaches the duty to keep your child safe and your child is injured as a result to the point of sustaining damages (financial impacts), the school may be found negligent – and thus liable to provide compensation.

It’s a good idea to talk with an experienced attorney about whether you’ve got a case before making any big decisions. Remember that injury lawyers are paid on a contingency fee basis, meaning that we offer free initial consultations and you pay nothing unless/until you win your case. So there’s no risk in reaching out to a local lawyer just to ask whether you have grounds to take further legal action.

Accountability for Injuries in School

Examples of injuries in schools that might warrant a civil claim for damages:

Accidents involving school property. Examples of dangerous school property could include rusted playground equipment, faulty gym equipment, dangerous science experiments, uneven flooring, etc.
Negligent supervision. If students aren’t reasonably supervised, they could be injured by another student, teacher or staff member. They might also just get themselves into an unsafe situation. This applies in the classroom, in specials, in the hallway, during pickup/drop-off and even on the bus. This claim can arise too when teachers or other school employees fail IEP guidelines intended to keep students safe.
Sports injuries. PE and school-sanctioned sporting events are a common source of school injury lawsuits.
Transportation accidents. School bus accidents and injuries, school bus stop injuries, chaotic pickup and drop off lines that lead to kids getting struck in the school parking lot – any of these could result in school district liability for child injuries.
Medical malpractice. It doesn’t happen often, but if the school nurse fails to follow the applicable standard of care for their professional medical position, the school may be sued for medical malpractice.
Assault, battery, bullying, etc. When incidents of violence happen on school grounds, schools may be held liable if the harm was foreseeable and they failed to stop it. Bullying typically escalates over time, giving school officials opportunities to become aware and intervene.
Sexual abuse/molestation. If a child is sexually assaulted or attacked at school or by a school employee, parents can pursue civil liability separate from and in addition to criminal charges.

Published on: August 28, 2024

Proving Proximate Cause in a Fort Myers Personal Injury Claim

by Leland Garvin

Fort Myers personal injury lawyer doctor examines broken leg In Fort Myers personal injury cases, proving proximate is key.

Causation generally is a key element in any personal injury claim. Injury cases mostly stem from allegations of negligence. To prove general negligence, we have to show the defendant owed our client a duty of care, they failed to use reasonable care, and that failure caused our client’s injuries. Causation is the crux of what connects the conduct of the defendant to the injuries of the plaintiff.

If the defense can prove something else was a greater factor in causing the plaintiff’s injuries, they’ll likely win the case – no matter how egregious their fault or how serious a plaintiff’s injuries. To prove causation, we have to show that but for the defendant’s actions, the harm would not have occurred.

Definition of Proximate Cause

So what is proximate cause?

Fort Myers personal injury lawyers use this term to assert that the defendant is legally responsible for our client’s injuries because their actions were either a substantial factor causing the harm AND/OR, the harm caused was a natural and foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions.

That doesn’t mean the defendant’s actions were the sole cause. Sometimes injuries have multiple causes. But the proximate cause is the one that we aim to prove when we’re pursuing a case for legal (financial) responsibility for the resulting harm. Continue reading

Published on: June 4, 2024

In Fort Myers Slip-and-Fall Lawsuits, Witness Statements May Be Key

by Leland Garvin

Fort Myers slip and fall lawyer Witnesses can play a pivotal role in any Florida personal injury case – and that includes Fort Myers slip-and-fall lawsuits (also known as Premises Liability lawsuits). Sometimes with the ubiquitous presence of security and cell phone cameras, it’s easy to forget that the firsthand accounts of other people can be invaluable in helping us reconstruct what happened and who was at-fault.

Even with video evidence, some of the strategic reasons Fort Myers slip-and-fall injury attorneys will present witness testimony of an incident:

Corroboration. A witness – particularly one that has no connection to the plaintiff/injured person – can back up the plaintiff’s story. This not only bolsters the plaintiff’s credibility, but also strengthens their case by providing additional evidence of the defendant’s negligence. Judges and jurors are going to be more convinced of the testimony you’re providing if multiple other witnesses are consistently saying the same thing.
Observations you may have missed. When a person is seriously injured, their focus in that moment can sometimes narrow to the pain point. This might cause them to miss key bits of information that might prove crucial to the case. Witnesses can help fill in the blanks.
Establishing actual or constructive knowledge. Florida slip-and-fall claims aren’t easy to win. F.S. 768.0755, Florida’s slip-and-fall statute, requires evidence that the defendant/property owner had actual or constructive knowledge of a dangerous condition on site and failed to take action to remedy it. It should noted that this statute affects only cases when a transitory foreign substance is involved- The witnesses are sometimes even employees of the defendant – sometimes provide this evidence by detailing their actual knowledge of the hazard (ex: “I saw the spill and told my manager, but nothing was done to fix it or warn customers”) or testimony that the condition had existed for some time or occurred with regularity (thereby establishing constructive knowledge).

To be useful in a Fort Myers slip-and-fall case, eyewitness testimony needs to come from a person with firsthand knowledge of relevant events, a good memory, a consistent story and decent credibility. They must also be willing to testify in court. While written statements can be helpful to your lawyer’s investigation, they may be considered inadmissible in court as hearsay without the witness’s willingness to swear to it under oath.

Recent Florida Slip-and-Fall Case Underscores Importance of Witness Testimony

Published on: December 21, 2023

“Deck the Halls – Not Your Steering Wheel,” Advises Fort Myers Injury Lawyer

by Leland Garvin

Snowman-Steering-Wheels-300x220 Sparkling decor is part of the magic of the holiday season. But as a Fort Myers injury lawyer, I’d strongly advise you to keep it away from your steering wheel.

The National Highway Traffic Safety administration (NHTSA) just issued a warning not long ago about the dangers of aftermarket, gem-studded decals that can cause serious injury in a crash. In one documented case, a driver lost sight in one eye after a rhinestone-emblazoned decal dislodged from the wheel during a crash and struck her in the face.

Aftermarket Vehicle Parts Can Complicate Product Liability Case

Published on: December 5, 2023

Keeping Kids Safe Means Minimizing South Florida School Zone Crash Risk

by Leland Garvin

South Florida school zone crash lawyer School zone or zoo? Anyone who’s traversed a school zone South Florida at busy pickup or drop-off times might have a tough time discerning. For all school officials and traffic safety engineers prioritize keeping kids safe, the Florida school zone crash risk is still high : Speeding drivers, school bus drivers with big blind spots, distracted walkers and cyclists (especially those with noise-canceling headphones), jaywalkers, and unsafe pickup/drop off behaviors in among 1/3 drivers (double-parking, stopping in the middle of the crosswalk, etc.).

There are an estimated 3.2 million schoolchildren in the U.S. (public and private). According to the Florida Department of Education, about 500,000 students ride a bus. In Lee, Collier, and Charlotte Counties, about 25%-35% of kids take the bus. The rest walk, ride a bike, or are car riders. In Lee County alone, 1,300 students are classified as facing “hazardous walking conditions” on their way to school (about 12,300 statewide).

According to the Transportation Research Board, an estimated 25,000 kids are injured and 100 are killed each year while walking to or from school. Not all of those happen in school zones, though most do involve speeding vehicles. About 30 percent of school zones do not have crosswalks.

As longtime Fort Myers personal injury lawyers, we know that unfortunately, Florida has the third-highest number of annual child traffic deaths, and consistently ranks at the top of the list for child pedestrian and bicycle deaths. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the most dangerous time for child pedestrians is between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. – after school hours.

Traffic Rules in Florida School Zones

The posted speed limit in most Florida school zones is 20 mph, though some cities and counties have lowered it even further to 15 mph. Going even 1 mph over that limit can result in a $50 fine – without any prior warnings. Anything above that, and you’re facing a fine of between $200 and $500 (depending on how fast you’re going), plus 3 points on your license (both of which can be waived if the prosecutor allows you to take a traffic safety course). Flashing yellow lights are drivers’ main indicator upon entering and exiting. Enforcement times are typically posted on road signage, though it’s usually 30 minutes prior to the start of school, during school hours, and 30 minutes after school hours have concluded. And in case you didn’t know: It’s illegal to obstruct a crosswalk in a school zone, even if you’re picking up or dropping off a child. If there’s a crossing guard, drivers must obey all their instructions. school zone crash lawyer Florida

In an effort to bolster student safety near schools, a new Florida law went into effect July 1, 2023 to heighten enforcement of school zone speed limits. The law authorizes city or county governments to enforce speed limits in school zones with speed detection systems (similar to red light cameras). Although the idea of speed cameras isn’t especially popular with motorists, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention reports their presence can reduce the total crash risk from 8 to 49 percent.

Some say it doesn’t go far enough, though, because violators won’t incur points on their license, and their infractions won’t result in higher auto insurance rates.

Existing law outlined in F.S. 316.306 prohibits the use of handheld wireless communication devices (cell phones, mainly) while driving through a designated school crossing or in a school zone. To do so is considered a primary offense (for which police can initiate a traffic stop).

Reduce Florida School Zone Crash Risk

Published on: July 18, 2023

Legal Liability for Florida Swimming Pool Accidents

by Leland Garvin

Fort Myers Florida swimming pool accidents Here in South Florida, swimming pools are a way of life. Unfortunately, they can also be the cause of death and serious injury. Florida swimming pool accidents result in hundreds of drownings each year – many of them children.

While pools can be a ton of fun, understanding the inherent dangers can go a long way toward keeping pool-goers alert, particularly when kids or other vulnerable populations are in close proximity.

Residential pools – of which there are well over 1.1 million in Florida – are the site of 60 percent of all drownings in the Sunshine State. Still, resorts, water parks, hotels, apartment complexes, and condo associations are common sites as well. Individuals and entities can be held legally liable for drownings or other injuries if there is evidence they failed to provide proper maintenance, signage, security/fencing, or supervision.

Kids under 5 are at the highest risk of drowning deaths. It doesn’t take more than a minute or two. The vast majority of young kids who drown in Florida are out of sight for no more than 5 minutes – and 70 percent of those weren’t expected to be anywhere near a pool at the time it happened.

In addition to drowning, other types of Florida swimming pool accidents include: Continue reading

Published on: April 14, 2023

Florida Injury Lawsuits: Tougher to File, Win & Payout with Passing of the New Insurance Bill

by Leland Garvin

Once again, tort reform has made it tougher for victims of Florida car accidents to sue and collect fair damages for their losses. In order to get this passed the legislature has inaccurately pointed the finger at the allegation of frivolous Florida injury lawsuits and sky-high compensation payouts as the cause of high customer insurance premiums.

Reality check: Insurers are doing just fine. They even contributed $7 plus million to Florida politicians last year. Furthermore, the amount of insurance premiums paid by customers has little to do with accident claim payouts. It has a lot more to do with insurer profit margins.

Time and again, we’ve seen legislation enacted that makes it harder to sue and collect fair compensation against negligent motorists, businesses, and doctors – but fails to lower insurance premiums. Take for instance the Florida law passed in 2003 to limit medical malpractice pain-and-suffering damage payouts. At the time, state lawmakers insisted there was a “crisis” facing medical malpractice insurers that forced the industry to charge doctors super high premiums, to the point doctors had no choice but to relocate their practices out-of-state. This was all justified by basically arguing that greedy patients and plaintiff lawyers were exploiting medical malpractice insurance for big bucks. In a 2014 overturning of those damage caps, the Florida Supreme Court blasted lawmakers for their initial reasons for passing the law – while also noting it never made a dent in doctors’ insurance bills. In Estate of McCall v. U.S., the Court called the lawmakers’ justifications “arbitrary” and “irrational,” and an “offense to the fundamental notion of equal justice under the law.” In that 5-2 opinion, the court noted the effect of saving a modest amount for many meant imposing devastating costs on the few – namely those catastrophically injured. “If there ever was an alleged medical malpractice crisis” in the first place, the Court remarked skeptically in its reversal, there wasn’t one anymore.

But state lawmakers haven’t stopped trying to use this as a justification for ongoing efforts to make life easier for insurers. In the years since, they’ve continued pressing measures reducing both liability and damage awards for dangerous property conditions, car accidents, and work injuries. They’ve also targeted payouts from life and health insurance.

Now, proponents of this new law have promised that it will help eliminate the so-called “tort tax” imposed on citizens – something that doesn’t actually exist.

As you can imagine, our Fort Myers personal injury lawyers are among the many trial lawyers who strongly opposed this legislation. We believe that these new laws will disenfranchise people who have suffered serious injuries because of someone else’s wrongdoing. It’s not just lawyers, though. Other vocal opponents include doctors, bicyclists, and previous car accident victims – many of whom showed up in significant numbers at state committee hearings on the issue.

What Exactly Will this the Law Do?

The legislation – House Bill 837 and Senate Bill 236 – has made it more difficult to file, win, and fairly collect on well-founded Florida injury lawsuits. These bills were fast-tracked by lawmakers and quickly signed into law by Governor Desantis.
Continue reading

Published on: December 22, 2022

Can Both Drivers Be At-Fault in a Fort Myers Car Accident?

by Leland Garvin

Fort Myers car accident lawyer Every single day, there are an average of 1,050 Florida car accidents, according to the Florida Department Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Almost always, the cause(s) of a crash can be traced to driver error. Common Fort Myers car accident catalysts include things like speeding, failure to yield, improper turning, following too closely, driving carelessly or recklessly, disregarding traffic signs or signals, failure to maintain proper lane, and driving while distracted or impaired.

But what if both drivers were at-fault in a crash?

As longtime Fort Myers car accident lawyers, we know it’s fairly common that both drivers shoulder some degree of responsibility for the collision. But what truly influences the dollar amount outcome in a Florida car accident case is not so much whether the injured plaintiff (the person filing the claim) shares any blame at all, but rather: How much?

This is because Florida follows a system of pure comparative negligence (referred to in F.S. 768.81 as comparative fault).

What is Pure Comparative Fault – and Why Does it Matter in Fort Myers Car Accident Cases?

Pure comparative fault means that in any negligence action – including car crash claims – the at-fault parties are only responsible to pay for their own portion of the blame. So in a two-car crash with both parties sharing some measure of fault, the damage award (legalese for financial compensation aka money) that is available to the plaintiff will be proportionally reduced by how much of the blame they share.

For example, if Driver 1 was 30 percent at-fault, Driver 2 was 70 percent at-fault, and total damages topped $100,000, the most that Driver 1 could collect as a Florida plaintiff would be $70,000. Conversely, the most Driver 2 could collect as a plaintiff would be $30,000.

“Pure comparative fault” means that even a person who is 99 percent at-fault for a Fort Myers car accident could still collect on 1 percent of their total damages from the other at-fault driver. That said, collecting only 1 percent of damages (ex: $1,000 on a $100,000 claim) isn’t a desirable outcome for any plaintiff. Skilled South Florida injury lawyers know how to make effective legal arguments to help minimize assertions of comparative fault – with the end goal of maximizing your damage award payout.

It should be noted that Florida is in the minority of states for its pure comparative fault law. Most other states with comparative fault laws impose a 50 percent or 51 percent “bar.” That means each person or entity is only financially responsible to cover their own percentage of fault. BUT if the plaintiff is 50+ percent to blame, they will be barred from collecting anything at all. Some states take it even further, holding that if a plaintiff shares just 1 percent of fault, they are barred from collecting anything at all.

So Florida is actually one of the most plaintiff-favorable states in this regard. However, that doesn’t mean your car accident case will be easy or that you should cede much ground on this issue if you can help it.

Wait – Isn’t Florida a No-Fault Car Accident State?

Published on: November 23, 2022

Florida Roadway Hazards After a Major Hurricane

by Leland Garvin

Florida roadway hazards after hurricane Southwest Florida is still reeling from the unprecedented devastation of Hurricane Ian, a huge storm with near-Category 5 winds and storm surges that reached 12-18 feet in some areas of Lee County.

At Garvin Injury Law, we are lifelong Floridians and while we have lived through many previous storms this one was particularly tough. Along with the rest of the community, our hearts are broken at the loss of life and the sheer scope of damage and displacement. As we all grieve what’s been lost, begin to clear the rubble, and prepare for our next steps, we want to make sure folks are aware that there are still a number of ongoing roadway hazards after a hurricane. Motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, truck drivers – all of us need to be using extra caution as we navigate our battered neighborhoods.

We all know it’s not wise to be driving during a big storm if it’s avoidable. But in the wake of a major hurricane, there are many Florida roadway hazards that persist in the days, weeks, and even months following. There’s flooding, of course, though that has thankfully receded for the most part. But it’s given way to new dangers. We’re now seeing the traffic in coastal cities like Fort Myers, Naples, and Cape Coral becoming badly gridlocked. There are also issues with non-functioning traffic signals, damaged/washed out roadways, roadway debris, more pedestrians/bicyclists than usual, and people attempting to drive vehicles that have been damaged by flood waters.

Here, we’ll outline some of the top road concerns – and how to stay safe on our streets as we work toward recovery and rebuilding. Continue reading